Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions David A. Wheeler 27 Aug 2012 01:06 UTC
> On the other hand, *I* (almkglor) have seen Scheme code that looks like this:
> (let ([x foo][y bar])
> ...)
Yeccch.
Well, a pretty-printer would solve that in a hurry. I suspect few pretty-printers would do that by default (and even if they did, I'd expect that to be configurable).
Since R7RS doesn't require support for [] as a synonym for (), if they update for R7RS, maybe they'd be willing to fix that.
--- David A. Wheeler