> On the other hand, *I* (almkglor) have seen Scheme code that looks like this:
> (let ([x foo][y bar])
>  ...)

Yeccch.

Well, a pretty-printer would solve that in a hurry.  I suspect few pretty-printers would do that by default (and even if they did, I'd expect that to be configurable).

Since R7RS doesn't require support for [] as a synonym for (), if they update for R7RS, maybe they'd be willing to fix that.

--- David A. Wheeler