Re: I think we're done with SRFI-105! Alan Manuel Gloria 21 Oct 2012 22:18 UTC
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David A. Wheeler <email@example.com> wrote: > I think we're done with SRFI-105! Please post ASAP if there is some really important problem with the specification as posted. Unless I hear otherwise soon, we're done. > > My sincere THANKS to EVERYONE who commented on the spec or otherwise worked on it! I appreciate all your time. > > At this point, I hope that Scheme implementations will consider implementing it in their default distributions. My thanks to those who have already started this process. > > --- David A. Wheeler > Caught a minor typo: diff --git a/SRFI-105.html b/SRFI-105.html index 52c2566..23546c5 100644 --- a/SRFI-105.html +++ b/SRFI-105.html @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ in a file (e.g., put a newline in front of it). If the file began with <var>#!curly-infix</var>, is made executable, and then execution is attempted, this might confuse some systems into trying to run the -program <var>srfi-105</var>. +program <var>curly-infix</var>. </p> <p>By intent, this SRFI (including the enabling mechanism) -- I pushed this on the devel branch of readable-code.