Re: Please update SRFI-105
David A. Wheeler 29 Oct 2012 21:33 UTC
Dear editors: Please post this update to SRFI-105.
Nothing like an announced deadline to get last-minute comments in :-).
This version has a bunch of minor stuff, again, it does *NOT* change the semantics of the specification at all:
- Fix URL for Paul Graham comment about infix being "natural"
- Clarify text noting that the mappings like e(...) MUST NOT be applied
if there's a space between e and the open paired character.
- Add MUST for recursion left-to-right, to clarify that this is required
- Make mapping discussion of f{...} a little more consistent
- Note that datum comments are from SRFI-62, R6R7, and R7RS draft 6
- Add {...} around example {#1=f(#1#)}
- Emphasize in rationale that curly-infix allows ANY symbol to be used
as an infix operator (that's the difference, not that you can use it)
- Move text about symbols in infix.plt, to make it clearer
- A few minor style improvements
- Add text about $nfx$ and $bracket-apply$ based on a
guile-devel post by Mark H. Weaver on 2012-10-26
--- David A. Wheeler