Re: Please update SRFI-105
David A. Wheeler
(29 Oct 2012 21:33 UTC)
|
Re: Please update SRFI-105
Alan Manuel Gloria
(30 Oct 2012 01:58 UTC)
|
Re: Please update SRFI-105
David A. Wheeler
(30 Oct 2012 16:30 UTC)
|
Re: Please update SRFI-105
Jens Axel Søgaard
(30 Oct 2012 18:54 UTC)
|
infix.plt
David A. Wheeler
(31 Oct 2012 03:17 UTC)
|
Re: Please update SRFI-105
Mark H Weaver
(30 Oct 2012 06:52 UTC)
|
Re: Please update SRFI-105 David A. Wheeler (30 Oct 2012 16:25 UTC)
|
Re: Please update SRFI-105
Mark H Weaver
(30 Oct 2012 07:10 UTC)
|
Re: Please update SRFI-105 David A. Wheeler 30 Oct 2012 16:25 UTC
Mark H Weaver: > Instead of referencing this post via a URL to mail-archive.com, would > you mind using this one instead? > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-10/msg00134.html Sure! >> The $nfx$ and $bracket-apply symbols are unhygienic, [...] >You missed the '$' at the end of '$bracket-apply$'. Whups. Fixed. >Also, you might consider correcting this typo I made in my email: >> "apart from the fact that $nfx$ et are meant to be defined by the >> user, [...] >s/et are meant/etc are meant/ Okay. Actually, I think it's supposed to be "etc." since that is an abbreviation for "et cetera". --- David A. Wheeler