Re: finishing SRFI-107 - representation of namespace declarations
Per Bothner 30 Oct 2013 04:01 UTC
On 10/29/2013 07:01 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Per Bothner scripsit:
>
>> (NOTE: This isn't quite ready yet for review: I think the syntax and
>> translations (into core S-expressions) are close to done, but the
>> over-all structure needs more work.)
>
> I saw a few typos: for "tagname" read "element name", for "XMLName" read
> "XML name", for "builtin" read "built-in", for "segement" read "segment",
> for "Booleans" read "booleans", for "consitsing" read "consisting", for
> "An possible" read "A possible", for "oter" read "other", for "mininum"
> read "minimum", for "pre-defined" read "predefined", for "Testsuite" read
> "Test suite".
Thanks. I fixed these (in my private copy), except for:
XMLName - couldn't find that.
tagname - this is meant to be a syntactic non-terminal
that has the same role as NCName. Perhaps just using NCName is the
cleanest.
I changed the draft to use NCName. You can see the change here:
http://per.bothner.com/tmp/srfi-107/srfi-107.html#qualified-names
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/