Re: finishing SRFI-107 - representation of namespace declarations
John Cowan 30 Oct 2013 04:46 UTC
Per Bothner scripsit:
> XMLName - couldn't find that.
It should have said: for "XML Name" read "XML name", but I see that was
wrong. So no problem.
> tagname - this is meant to be a syntactic non-terminal
> that has the same role as NCName. Perhaps just using NCName is the
> cleanest.
+1
Another minor point I noticed: of the standard Scheme names, only
"space", "newline", and "tab" are actually serializable as XML 1.0;
consequently, things like "&bell;" are not worth having, because
whatever that might mean, it can't mean U+0007.
--
Using RELAX NG compact syntax to John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>
develop schemas is one of the simple http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
pleasures in life....
--Jeni Tennison <xxxxxx@ccil.org>