In the explanations of </>, you refer to "leaving out the ending tag".
You should refer instead to "leaving out the name of the end-tag".
In SGML this kind of tag was known as an "empty end-tag", but I don't
know that it's helpful to use that terminology today.
I'm still trying to review the rest of the spec in detail, but I wanted
to get this correction posted first.
--
Mos Eisley spaceport. You will never John Cowan
see a more wretched hive of scum and xxxxxx@ccil.org
villainy --unless you watch the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Jerry Springer Show. --georgettesworld.com