|
Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(27 Nov 2013 23:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(28 Nov 2013 03:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial John Cowan (28 Nov 2013 04:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(28 Nov 2013 04:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(07 Dec 2013 01:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(07 Dec 2013 19:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(08 Dec 2013 08:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 17:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(08 Dec 2013 20:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 23:23 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial John Cowan 28 Nov 2013 04:10 UTC
Scripsi:
> It was introduced into the XML spec for the sake of SGML compatibility,
> yes, not merely a recommendation for those who actually need
> compatibility But it is in itself a hardwired rule of XML.
Ouch. That should have read:
It was introduced into the XML spec for the sake of SGML compatibility,
yes. But it is in itself a hardwired rule of XML, not merely a
recommendation for those who actually need such compatibility.
--
John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Sir, I quite agree with you, but what are we two against so many?
--George Bernard Shaw,
to a man booing at the opening of _Arms and the Man_