SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters Per Bothner (10 Nov 2012 16:51 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Shiro Kawai
(11 Nov 2012 01:06 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Per Bothner
(11 Nov 2012 03:47 UTC)
|
Literals vs Quasi-literals (Was: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters)
Shiro Kawai
(12 Nov 2012 07:20 UTC)
|
Re: Literals vs Quasi-literals (Was: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters)
Per Bothner
(12 Nov 2012 17:08 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
John Cowan
(18 Nov 2012 21:22 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Per Bothner
(18 Nov 2012 21:50 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
John Cowan
(24 Nov 2012 06:55 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Michael Sperber
(11 Dec 2012 17:27 UTC)
|
SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters Per Bothner 10 Nov 2012 16:50 UTC
(Notice this initial message goes to both the SRFI 108 and 109 lists, but I set "Followup-to" to only the 108 list.) Welcome to SRFIs 108 and 109. I hope you will find these useful. The first order of business so to try to reach consensus about what special/delimiter characters to use. So I draw your attention to the section discussing this: http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-108/srfi-108.html#Delimiter-options If you have a preference as to which syntax works best, I'd like to hear it. Ideally try to mull the various alternatives, and perhaps play with them using pencil and paper. Do you prefer XML-style syntax, Scribble-style syntax, or something completely different? For now just reply t this message; if we get too many messages we may try a poll. Once there is a decision (I'm the benevolent dictator of these SRFIs), I'll simplify the presentation to reflect that decision. -- --Per Bothner xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/