On 11/25/2012 12:10 AM, Per Bothner wrote:
> What do you think of ($construct$:foo ..) instead of the rather
> ungainly ($quasi-value-transformer$:foo ...)?

I'm thinking the use of colon may cause some complications (or at
least portability issues), since Kawa does some magic with colons.

How about just plain:

&#foo[...] ==>  ($construct$foo ..)
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/