SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters Per Bothner (10 Nov 2012 16:51 UTC)
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters Shiro Kawai (11 Nov 2012 01:06 UTC)
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters Per Bothner (11 Nov 2012 03:47 UTC)
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters John Cowan (18 Nov 2012 21:22 UTC)
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters Per Bothner (18 Nov 2012 21:50 UTC)
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 06:55 UTC)
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters Michael Sperber (11 Dec 2012 17:27 UTC)

Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters Michael Sperber 11 Dec 2012 17:27 UTC

Per Bothner <xxxxxx@bothner.com> writes:

> If you have a preference as to which syntax works best, I'd like to
> hear it.  Ideally try to mull the various alternatives, and perhaps
> play with them using pencil and paper.  Do you prefer XML-style syntax,
> Scribble-style syntax, or something completely different?  For now just
> reply t this message; if we get too many messages we may try a poll.

While I prefer writing Scribble syntax to the XML syntax in SRFI
108/109, you're doing something different from Scribble, namely
embedding a syntax into Scheme rather than presenting an alternative.
For this, #& seems more in line with other parts of Scheme, and less
confusing for Scribble afficionados.

--
Regards,
Mike