Re: srfi-108 (named quasi-literal constructors) candidate John Cowan 27 Mar 2013 13:33 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

>    This specification uses "&" as marker/delimiter character.
>    Alternative marker characters were also considered, and
>    this mostly-historical section explains why we chose "&".
>    The discussion also considers SRFI-109, and refers to
>    the non-terminals defined in the syntax specifications
>    of both SRFI-108 and SRFI-109.


You annoy me, Rattray!  You disgust me!         John Cowan
You irritate me unspeakably!  Thank Heaven,
I am a man of equable temper, or I should
scarcely be able to contain myself before
your mocking visage.            --Stalky imitating Macrea