srfi-108 (named quasi-literal constructors) candidate Per Bothner (26 Mar 2013 04:20 UTC)
Re: srfi-108 (named quasi-literal constructors) candidate Per Bothner (27 Mar 2013 07:20 UTC)
Re: srfi-108 (named quasi-literal constructors) candidate John Cowan (27 Mar 2013 13:33 UTC)
Re: srfi-108 (named quasi-literal constructors) candidate Per Bothner (27 Mar 2013 16:12 UTC)

Re: srfi-108 (named quasi-literal constructors) candidate John Cowan 27 Mar 2013 13:33 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

>    This specification uses "&" as marker/delimiter character.
>    Alternative marker characters were also considered, and
>    this mostly-historical section explains why we chose "&".
>    The discussion also considers SRFI-109, and refers to
>    the non-terminals defined in the syntax specifications
>    of both SRFI-108 and SRFI-109.

+1

--
You annoy me, Rattray!  You disgust me!         John Cowan
You irritate me unspeakably!  Thank Heaven,     xxxxxx@ccil.org
I am a man of equable temper, or I should       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
scarcely be able to contain myself before
your mocking visage.            --Stalky imitating Macrea