Re: srfi-108 (named quasi-literal constructors) candidate
John Cowan 27 Mar 2013 13:33 UTC
Per Bothner scripsit:
> This specification uses "&" as marker/delimiter character.
> Alternative marker characters were also considered, and
> this mostly-historical section explains why we chose "&".
> The discussion also considers SRFI-109, and refers to
> the non-terminals defined in the syntax specifications
> of both SRFI-108 and SRFI-109.
+1
--
You annoy me, Rattray! You disgust me! John Cowan
You irritate me unspeakably! Thank Heaven, xxxxxx@ccil.org
I am a man of equable temper, or I should http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
scarcely be able to contain myself before
your mocking visage. --Stalky imitating Macrea