|
SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Per Bothner
(10 Nov 2012 16:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Shiro Kawai
(11 Nov 2012 01:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Per Bothner
(11 Nov 2012 03:47 UTC)
|
|
Literals vs Quasi-literals (Was: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters)
Shiro Kawai
(12 Nov 2012 07:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: Literals vs Quasi-literals (Was: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters)
Per Bothner
(12 Nov 2012 17:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters John Cowan (18 Nov 2012 21:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Per Bothner
(18 Nov 2012 21:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
John Cowan
(24 Nov 2012 06:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters
Michael Sperber
(11 Dec 2012 17:27 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI-108/SRFI-109 special characters John Cowan 18 Nov 2012 21:22 UTC
Shiro Kawai scripsit: > Thanks for an interesting srfi. I prefer xml-style, for (1) starting > with # makes it stand out more as an extended syntax, and (2) for > something like srfi-109 we can refer to the existing XML standard when > it's useful (e.g. entity reference). I strongly prefer XML-style with braces. This use of braces will not conflict with SRFI-105, nor will it conflict with the existing uses of brackets as alternative parens. (In Chicken, braces are also alternative parens, unfortunately, but that can be changed.) > There's one thing that confused me, though. (Maybe because of the > arrangement of the document). I haven't properly reviewed this paper yet, but I'm guessing it will need some editorial reorganization as well. More later. -- I could dance with you till the cows John Cowan come home. On second thought, I'd http://www.ccil.org/~cowan rather dance with the cows when you xxxxxx@ccil.org come home. --Rufus T. Firefly