On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:05:02 -0400, Mark H Weaver <xxxxxx@netris.org> wrote:
> I finally took a look at the new spec, and it's definitely much clearer
> than before.  At this point, I have no major complaints with how you've
> expressed the grammar.  Thanks for working so hard to make it so.
> Thanks also for making datum comments usable as intended when used with
> sweet expressions.

You're welcome!  Thanks for your comments.

> ... I'm sorry to say that I find most
> of your nontrivial examples neither clear nor aesthetically pleasing,
> especially where SUBLIST and/or GROUP are used in clever ways to make
> the code more compact.

Which part are you referring to?
We can change examples!!

...
> For Guile, what I'd like to do is to provide the needed hooks and
> extension points in our core reader, so that both wisp and SRFI-110
> (if you choose to finalize it) can be supported without having to
> reimplement the entire reader from scratch.

That's *awesome*.  Thanks so much!
I look forward to that.

--- David A. Wheeler