|
Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Feeley
(09 Nov 2022 16:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 16:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Feeley (09 Nov 2022 17:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 18:55 UTC)
|
> On Nov 9, 2022, at 12:04 PM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > > In any case, this is not a Chez thing, but an R[56]RS thing; many > syntactic data (vectors, bytevectors, ...) do not form a valid > expression. I would need to double check, but vectors and bytevectors are self evaluating in R7RS. Marc
