Re: Exposing the stride and offset
Pierpaolo Bernardi 05 Aug 2015 23:53 UTC
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:15 AM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> This is a proposal for a substantive (and substantial) change to SRFI 122.
I think what you described is SRFI 25?
(With the possible exception of rational indexes, I'm not sure they
can be arranged in SRFI 25 arrays)