There is a similar discrepancy between the order of arguments of xxx-unfold and the sample implementation. What is the intended order?

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de>
Date: Mi., 14. Dez. 2016 um 10:26 Uhr
Subject: Order of arguments of set-map
To: srfi-113@srfi.schemers.org <srfi-113@srfi.schemers.org>


Is it (set-map comparator proc set) or (set-map proc comparator set)? The specification in SRFI 113 is the former, it gives one example for the former and one for the latter, the sample implementation uses the latter.

--

Marc