On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:25 AM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
<p><b>Post-finalization note 3</b>:
The "Comparator restrictions" section of this SRFI states that
implementations must not require comparators used to create
sets or bags to have both an ordering predicate and a hash
function.  However, in practice this is a nullity, because there
is no way to determine which type of procedure the implementation
requires, and therefore users must supply both procedures.  Now that
(in draft status at the time of this writing) requires comparators
with ordering predicates, the author of this SRFI strongly urges
implementers to accept comparators with hash functions with or
without ordering predicates. The sample implementation,
which is built on top of hash tables, already does so.</p>

That sounds reasonable to me.

Let's wait a day or so more for the discussion to finish.  After that, let me know when you're ready.