Jim Rees scripsit:

> In combination with the Issues section of HashTablesCowan, why the apparent
> bias against user-supplied hash-functions?

Primarily because many Schemes don't support them.

> SRFI-113 can't do either of these as far as I can tell, but I can live with
> that if a separate hashtable api gives me the added generality.

Please take a look at ComparatorsCowan.  I have submitted it as a
SRFI, and I intend to retrofit that function into both SRFI-113 and
HashTablesCowan.  I'm writing the implementation now.

--
If I read "upcoming" in [the newspaper]              John Cowan
once more, I will be downcoming                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and somebody will be outgoing.                       xxxxxx@ccil.org