Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(04 Dec 2013 04:37 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Kevin Wortman
(08 Dec 2013 04:35 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 18:05 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 18:15 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Kevin Wortman
(09 Dec 2013 00:43 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113 John Cowan (09 Dec 2013 08:04 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Alex Shinn
(09 Dec 2013 08:16 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(09 Dec 2013 15:59 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Alex Shinn
(09 Dec 2013 00:39 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(09 Dec 2013 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Alex Shinn
(10 Dec 2013 01:18 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(10 Dec 2013 21:35 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Alex Shinn
(11 Dec 2013 00:55 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(16 Dec 2013 07:12 UTC)
|
Kevin Wortman scripsit: > If the "delete x from A" operation invalidates the "for each element x" > cursor then you're out of luck. And yet my implementation of sets actually does this! Oops. Well, the implementation needs a massive update anyway. > Then again, insisting that live cursors stay valid is a heavy > implementation burden that adds a lot of complexity and effectively > prohibits some data structures. Exactly so. -- John Cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan Female celebrity stalker, on a hot morning in Cairo: "Imagine, Colonel Lawrence, ninety-two already!" El Auruns's reply: "Many happy returns of the day!"