Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(04 Dec 2013 04:37 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Kevin Wortman
(08 Dec 2013 04:35 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 18:05 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 18:15 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Kevin Wortman
(09 Dec 2013 00:43 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(09 Dec 2013 08:04 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Alex Shinn
(09 Dec 2013 08:16 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113 John Cowan (09 Dec 2013 15:59 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Alex Shinn
(09 Dec 2013 00:39 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(09 Dec 2013 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Alex Shinn
(10 Dec 2013 01:18 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(10 Dec 2013 21:35 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
Alex Shinn
(11 Dec 2013 00:55 UTC)
|
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
John Cowan
(16 Dec 2013 07:12 UTC)
|
Alex Shinn scripsit: > We should document whether or not it's an error to > mutate a set while it is being folded over (I would say > it's an error). Added. I have also added the analogue of `iset-update!` from ImmutableDataStructuresWortman under the name of `set-search!`. The name comes from HashTablesCowan, where `update!` is in use for something else. -- John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Sir, I quite agree with you, but what are we two against so many? --George Bernard Shaw, to a man booing at the opening of _Arms and the Man_