set->bag! ambiguity - Simplelists

Show/hide message thread

set->bag! ambiguity Aubrey Jaffer (16 Aug 2014 00:57 UTC)

Re: set->bag! ambiguity John Cowan (16 Aug 2014 06:28 UTC)

set->bag! ambiguity Aubrey Jaffer 16 Aug 2014 00:57 UTC

I believe there is an ambiguity regarding the comparator in the value
returned by SET->BAG!:

  The set->bag! procedure returns a bag containing the elements of both
  bag and set.  In all cases, the comparator of the result is the same
  as the comparator of the argument.

But SET->BAG! has two arguments; which comparator is used?