Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures?

Show/hide message thread

why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? Peter McGoron (15 Mar 2025 23:24 UTC)

Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? Arthur A. Gleckler (15 Mar 2025 23:27 UTC)

Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? Shiro Kawai (15 Mar 2025 23:31 UTC)

Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? John Cowan (16 Mar 2025 15:31 UTC)

Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Mar 2025 15:37 UTC)

Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? Arthur A. Gleckler (19 Mar 2025 20:14 UTC)

Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? Peter McGoron (19 Mar 2025 23:09 UTC)

Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? Arthur A. Gleckler (19 Mar 2025 23:32 UTC)

Re: why specifically restrict set-comparator and bag-comparator to not have comparison procedures? Peter McGoron 19 Mar 2025 23:06 UTC

Thank you for the clarification.

One very small thing: the SRFI on the SRFI website has "required"
misspelled as "requireed".

-- Peter McGoron