New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan (04 Dec 2013 04:16 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Dec 2013 05:52 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan (04 Dec 2013 20:28 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation Michael Sperber (04 Dec 2013 08:38 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan (04 Dec 2013 13:52 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation Shiro Kawai (04 Dec 2013 13:54 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan (04 Dec 2013 20:49 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation Shiro Kawai (04 Dec 2013 23:46 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan (05 Dec 2013 18:35 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation Shiro Kawai (05 Dec 2013 22:08 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation Kevin Wortman (08 Dec 2013 02:32 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan (08 Dec 2013 03:13 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation Kevin Wortman (08 Dec 2013 03:45 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan (08 Dec 2013 17:01 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation Kevin Wortman (09 Dec 2013 00:10 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan (09 Dec 2013 00:30 UTC)

Re: New release of SRFI 114 with implementation John Cowan 04 Dec 2013 20:28 UTC

Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> My only question is about the decision to make
> comparison of NaNs have meaning in make-inexact-real-comparator.  I don't
> have much experience with NaNs, but it seems risky to give meaning to
> comparing them.

You have a point, and SRFI 67 leaves them implementation-defined altogether.
Still, with them being at least semi-standardized in R6RS and R7RS,
I thought there should be some way, if you know you are dealing with
inexact numbers, to recover from the situation by supplying your own
NaN handler.  That allows you to put arbitrary inexact numbers into a collection
such as a set or hash table.

--
John Cowan              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan      xxxxxx@ccil.org
"After all, would you consider a man without honor wealthy, even if his
Dinar laid end to end would reach from here to the Temple of Toplat?"
"No, I wouldn't", the beggar replied.  "Why is that?" the Master asked.
"A Dinar doesn't go very far these days, Master.        --Kehlog Albran
Besides, the Temple of Toplat is across the street."      The Profit