Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al

Show/hide message thread

Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al Alan Manuel Gloria (26 Feb 2014 04:16 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al Kevin Wortman (28 Feb 2014 06:39 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al Alan Manuel Gloria (28 Feb 2014 22:00 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al Kevin Wortman (09 Mar 2014 05:03 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al John Cowan (09 Mar 2014 19:49 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al John Cowan (05 Mar 2014 01:36 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al Alan Manuel Gloria (15 Mar 2014 10:02 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al Alan Manuel Gloria (15 Mar 2014 10:08 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al John Cowan (15 Mar 2014 16:15 UTC)

Re: Have one-argument '<? et al function as 'make<? et al Alan Manuel Gloria 28 Feb 2014 22:00 UTC

I don't quite see how.  Like this?

((cute . {v-find <> v}) (make<? c))

Could you give an example?  I don't quite grok what you mean.

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Kevin Wortman <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I like it; but you can already do this with the SRFI 26 cute syntax,
> right?
>
> Kevin Wortman
>
>