Kevin Wortman scripsit:

> For what it's worth, I don't really see what's wrong with SRFI 114. I've
> been implementing finger trees on top of SRFI 114 comparators, and the
> comparators seem to work fine.

I've gotten feedback that it's too large and hairy for a core Scheme
component that is required to make use of sets and possibly hash tables.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
As you read this, I don't want you to feel sorry for me, because,
I believe everyone will die someday.
               --From a Nigerian-type scam spam