Comparator syntax if<=> John Cowan (02 Nov 2015 04:12 UTC)
Re: Comparator syntax if<=> Kevin Wortman (02 Nov 2015 18:51 UTC)
Re: Comparator syntax if<=> John Cowan (04 Nov 2015 06:23 UTC)

Re: Comparator syntax if<=> John Cowan 04 Nov 2015 06:23 UTC

Kevin Wortman scripsit:

> Yes, these semantics would meet my need. Actually this definition of if<=>
> is more convenient for me than if3 was.

Excellent.

> Alternative names for consideration: case/comparator, case/order, branch.

SRFI 128 commenters should address these.

> (I'm assuming you meant me, "Kevin" Wortman, since the likelihood of
> someone else with a similar name having the same concern at the same time
> seems remote. :P )

Sometimes when I think about someone after not thinking about them for a while,
they get re-christened.  I referred to the Guile implementor Andy Wingo
as "Tom Wingo" for a while.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
The Unicode Standard does not encode idiosyncratic, personal, novel,
or private use characters, nor does it encode logos or graphics.