|
regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague (26 Nov 2013 03:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Alex Shinn
(26 Nov 2013 12:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Peter Bex
(26 Nov 2013 14:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Michael Montague
(26 Nov 2013 18:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Peter Bex
(26 Nov 2013 18:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Michael Montague
(26 Nov 2013 19:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
John Cowan
(26 Nov 2013 18:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Michael Montague
(26 Nov 2013 19:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Peter Bex
(26 Nov 2013 19:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Kevin Wortman
(26 Nov 2013 19:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Michael Montague
(26 Nov 2013 19:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Kevin Wortman
(27 Nov 2013 23:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
John Cowan
(27 Nov 2013 23:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(30 Nov 2013 14:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Michael Montague
(26 Nov 2013 18:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
John Cowan
(26 Nov 2013 18:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Michael Montague
(26 Nov 2013 19:11 UTC)
|
Why can the procedure 'regexp' be called with an already compiled <re> which is just returned? Why is the procedure 'valid-sre?' necessary? You could just call 'regexp' and use 'guard' to check for any errors.
