regexp and valid-sre? | Simplelists

regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague (26 Nov 2013 03:34 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Alex Shinn (26 Nov 2013 12:44 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Peter Bex (26 Nov 2013 14:25 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague (26 Nov 2013 18:00 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Peter Bex (26 Nov 2013 18:21 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague (26 Nov 2013 19:09 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? John Cowan (26 Nov 2013 18:24 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague (26 Nov 2013 19:17 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Peter Bex (26 Nov 2013 19:23 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Kevin Wortman (26 Nov 2013 19:52 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague (26 Nov 2013 19:59 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Kevin Wortman (27 Nov 2013 23:33 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? John Cowan (27 Nov 2013 23:42 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2013 14:55 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague (26 Nov 2013 18:02 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? John Cowan (26 Nov 2013 18:19 UTC)

Re: regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague (26 Nov 2013 19:11 UTC)

regexp and valid-sre? Michael Montague 26 Nov 2013 03:34 UTC

Why can the procedure 'regexp' be called with an already compiled <re>
which is just returned?

Why is the procedure 'valid-sre?' necessary? You could just call
'regexp' and use 'guard' to check for any errors.