Re: english names for symbolic SREs
John Cowan 27 Nov 2013 23:44 UTC
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> If portability were not an issue, say a few months down the line when
> IrRegex and SCSH are patched to support the long names, would you use
> them?
More like a few years before downstream systems follow. But if all of
that were aside, and I were using Scheme, yes, I'd use the long names.
They are easier for future programmers to maintain. (Normally I would
say "easier for myself too", but the fact is that the string REs are
engraved in my cortical fissures; I'm unlikely ever to forget them until
I'm quite senile -- if that ever happens.)
--
But you, Wormtongue, you have done what you could for your true master. Some
reward you have earned at least. Yet Saruman is apt to overlook his bargains.
I should advise you to go quickly and remind him, lest he forget your faithful
service. --Gandalf John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>