I've just published a fix for a small error in SRFI 115.  The
error was reported by the author, Alex Shinn, and he provided the
fix, too, so I have incorporated them into the public document and
added a note to the Status section.

Here's Alex's comment on this fix:

  The text says "zero or more combining marks," [so] the sample
  definition should match this.  One or more is clearly a bug and
  deserving of an errata.

Here's the diff:

   <https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-115/compare/a502cdcc351e70c314c9f81c430cebafa9f0f90a...3fbfe6cd16c253b7e45306372071fc3586bc400c>

Thank you, Alex.

Regards,

SRFI Editor