I think a post-finalization note is appropriate:  "The author of this SRFI recommands that implementers used SRFI 128 comparators rather than SRFI 114 comparators."'

Adding to the existing implementation would be great.  I'm not sure why I left them out.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:57 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:53 PM Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
The current reference implementation doesn't include comparators.

I can contribute to it, but I wonder---the current srfi is based on srfi-114 comparators.
Is there a plan for a new srfi that supersedes this for using srfi-128 comparators? 

Adding John.