On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:05 PM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:

I think a post-finalization note is appropriate: "The author of this SRFI recommands that implementers used SRFI 128 comparators rather than SRFI 114 comparators."'

Okay, I've added that as a post-finalization note.

Adding to the existing implementation would be great. I'm not sure why I left them out.

Shiro, if you or John or someone else would like to add them to the sample implementation, please do.

Thank you both.