On 05/08/2015 12:33 AM, Shiro Kawai wrote:
> Ok then, how about adding a note in string-replace! section,
> something like this?
>
>    Note: Srfi-13 has a nondestructive version, string-replace, which
>    takes the arguments in the following order:
>
>      (string-replace dst src dst-start dst-end [src-start [src-end]])
>
>    We adopt a different argument order here to be consistent to
>    string-copy!, and existing string-replace! implementations.

Sounds reasonable.  See attached diff.

Anything else before we declare it final?
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/