On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:I don't have access to my archive of the old site right now, but I just checked the final SRFIs page from January, 2015 on archive.org. I only see one SRFI with any kind of deprecated marker: SRFI 40. Do you remember others?114 is obsoleted by 128, and I remember asking you to mark it so, but I don't know if that ever happened.142 is obsoleted by 151.I think these are the only three cases.
From: Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com>
Date: Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:23 AM
Subject: Fwd: Post-finalization version of SRFI 113
To: srfi-113@srfi.schemers.org
I've published a new draft of SRFI 113 in which John Cowan,
the author, added this note:
Post-finalization note: Because SRFI 114 has been
deprecated by SRFI 128, it is recommended that
implementers make use of SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114
comparators where comparators are specified in this SRFI.
Specifically, the procedures set, bag, set-unfold,
bag-unfold, set-map, list->set, list->bag, and alist->bag,
should accept SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114 comparators as
arguments. By the same token, the results of
set-element-comparator and bag-element-comparator, as well
as the values of set-comparator and bag-comparator, should
be SRFI 128 comparators. The sample implementation has
been updated to depend on SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114.
In addition, could you move the paragraph that links to the final, draft, and withdrawn SRFIs *above* the main list (rewording it to say "below" for "above")? That would be much more convenient. Thanks.