On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:52 PM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:


On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

I don't have access to my archive of the old site right now, but I just checked the final SRFIs page from January, 2015 on archive.org.  I only see one SRFI with any kind of deprecated marker: SRFI 40.  Do you remember others?

114 is obsoleted by 128, and I remember asking you to mark it so, but I don't know if that ever happened.

142 is obsoleted by 151.

I think these are the only three cases.

That sounds fine.  You made me worried that I had lost a lot of information from the old pages, but it all of the cases you mention except 40/41 were after I replaced those pages.  Still, I will look into making that information more visible.

With regard to 128 vs. 114, here's what we discussed:

From: Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com>
Date: Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:23 AM
Subject: Fwd: Post-finalization version of SRFI 113
To: srfi-113@srfi.schemers.org

I've published a new draft of SRFI 113 in which John Cowan,
the author, added this note:
  Post-finalization note: Because SRFI 114 has been
  deprecated by SRFI 128, it is recommended that
  implementers make use of SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114
  comparators where comparators are specified in this SRFI.
  Specifically, the procedures set, bag, set-unfold,
  bag-unfold, set-map, list->set, list->bag, and alist->bag,
  should accept SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114 comparators as
  arguments.  By the same token, the results of
  set-element-comparator and bag-element-comparator, as well
  as the values of set-comparator and bag-comparator, should
  be SRFI 128 comparators.  The sample implementation has
  been updated to depend on SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114.

 
In addition, could you move the paragraph that links to the final, draft, and withdrawn SRFIs *above* the main list (rewording it to say "below" for "above")?  That would be much more convenient.  Thanks.

That's a good idea.  I will take care of that soon.