Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
John Cowan
(21 Jan 2021 18:40 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Mark H Weaver
(23 Jan 2021 00:59 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Shiro Kawai
(23 Jan 2021 02:15 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Arthur A. Gleckler
(23 Jan 2021 02:18 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Mark H Weaver
(23 Jan 2021 06:38 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
John Cowan
(26 Jan 2021 03:30 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Linus Björnstam
(26 Jan 2021 07:08 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 Jan 2021 07:15 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators Linus Björnstam (26 Jan 2021 16:03 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Arthur A. Gleckler
(08 Apr 2021 15:54 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Linus Björnstam
(11 Apr 2021 15:52 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Apr 2021 16:17 UTC)
|
Re: [PATCH] add SRFI: srfi-121; generators
Linus Björnstam
(27 Jan 2021 15:33 UTC)
|
The code's internet presence is apparently gone (bitbucket mercurial. I don't know how I missed that ). I won't have access to that code for about 2 weeks, but I will upload it and try to get it up to par with the updated SRFI-158. Lg. Linus Björnstam On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, at 08:14, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote: > Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 08:08 Uhr schrieb Linus Björnstam > <xxxxxx@veryfast.biz>: > > Hi Y'all! > > > > I have an efficient, almost done implementation of srfi-121. I believe it lacks generator-unfold, but that is all. make-coroutine-generator is implemented using delimited continuations and runs a lot faster than the one in the reference implementation, with the caveat that it is apparently slightly incompatible: the coroutine generator usage in (srfi 146 hash) yielded the wrong result - despite my version passing all tests. > > Can you post a MWE? >