Per Bothner scripsit:

> Overall, this seems a useful and reasonable SRFI.  However,
> I reserve judgment about whether it belongs in R7RS-large.

Yes, this isn't the time or place to make that decision yet.  The time
will probably be March and the place will be the WG2 mailing list.

> make-bits-generator n

Your point is well-taken.  I will suppress this generator and bring
something like it back when I consider bit vectors based on bignums
(for the Orange Edition).

> gcombine proc seed gen gen2 …
> IMO It would be more natural for proc to not take a seed.
> Instead we should standardize gmap:

Shiro Kawai scripsit:

> Given that generators are inherently stateful object, it may not be
> as important to have both gcombine and gmap as to have both map-accum
> and map.

That is exactly why I flushed gmap.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
Principles.  You can't say A is made of B or vice versa.
All mass is interaction.  --Richard Feynman