On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 12:02 AM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

Thanks.  I don't know what their licensing rules are.

There is no explicit license on the document itself, but the link to it at  <http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~ljdickey/apl-rep/> says it is unofficial, and its date is 2000 rather than 2001.  ISO makes its money by selling official copies of standards to those who are contractually or legally required to conform to them, and usually winks at the distribution of unofficial copies.  I have a copy of IEEE Scheme by similar means.

I'll wait to see what Bradley says about including anything like these in his new SRFI.

They don't have to be integrated, as they are all readily implementable on top of SRFI 122 (or 164 for that matter).
 
Have you seen Olin Shivers's work on an APL-like language? 

I'll look at that tomorrow along with some other APL stuff I found.
 
I could swear that he also had a paper on doing APL in Scheme, but I can't find it.  I may be thinking of his 2015 Scheme Workshop keynote, but I can't find that online.

Yes, keynotes are very often not transcribed, unfortunately.



John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
Does anybody want any flotsam? / I've gotsam.
Does anybody want any jetsam? / I can getsam.
        --Ogden Nash, No Doctors Today, Thank You