On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Bradley Lucier <xxxxxx@math.purdue.edu> wrote:

Sorry, no, not yet, even though I’ve made a fair number of changes in response to comments by John and Per. Perhaps I haven’t been putting enough time into it because of other things that have come up since then.

I think current open issues include:

1. What should the API be for functions like array-curry and array-distinguish-one-axis? I currently add a suffix to the name of the operation to indicate the type of the output of the operation, but that approach has met with almost universal disapproval.

2. I chose operations that I have found useful in my work. Should other operations, specifically permutation operators (transpose an array, etc.), be part of the SRFI?

Since the discussion has gone on for a while now, I would recommend not expanding this one, but instead concentrating on getting the existing APIs just right. I would recommend putting new operations in a separate SRFI. It's up to you, of course.