capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y

Show/hide message thread

capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y Per Bothner (29 Jul 2015 16:18 UTC)

Re: capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y John Cowan (29 Jul 2015 17:12 UTC)

Re: capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y Bradley Lucier (29 Jul 2015 19:59 UTC)

Re: capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y Bradley Lucier (31 Jul 2015 20:36 UTC)

capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y Per Bothner 29 Jul 2015 16:18 UTC

No other Scheme standard or SRFI (that I can think of) follows this capitalization
convention.  It shouldn't matter whether Interval is a class or a builtin type:
The names should be "interval", "internal?", "interval-dimensions", etc.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/