relationship to SRFI-25

Show/hide message thread

relationship to SRFI-25 Per Bothner (30 Jul 2015 05:30 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 John Cowan (30 Jul 2015 20:20 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (31 Jul 2015 21:00 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (26 Sep 2015 18:33 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Per Bothner (27 Sep 2015 05:34 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (28 Sep 2015 21:04 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Per Bothner (28 Sep 2015 21:29 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (28 Sep 2015 21:54 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Jamison Hope (28 Sep 2015 22:22 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (28 Sep 2015 22:38 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Jamison Hope (28 Sep 2015 23:20 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (29 Sep 2015 06:03 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Jamison Hope (29 Sep 2015 16:12 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (30 Sep 2015 03:42 UTC)

relationship to SRFI-25 Per Bothner 30 Jul 2015 05:30 UTC

What is not discussed is how SRFI-122 differs from SRFI-25, and why?

How is a SRFI-122 interval different from a SRFI-25 shape?

Why can't SRFI-122 be a compatible superset of SRFI-25?

Why would anyone want to write:
   ((array-getter a) i j)
instead of:
   (array-ref a i j)
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/