Re: empty intervals Bradley Lucier 01 Aug 2015 02:00 UTC

On 07/31/2015 07:37 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Bradley Lucier scripsit:
>> I don't think we need that convention here, scheme has perfectly good
>> non-array objects.
> But so do Common Lisp, NumPy, Julia, and most significantly Racket
> <>.

Thank you for the pointer, I'm going to study Racket's arrays for a
while before commenting again.