|
empty intervals
Per Bothner
(29 Jul 2015 16:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(29 Jul 2015 17:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(29 Jul 2015 17:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(29 Jul 2015 20:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Per Bothner
(29 Jul 2015 20:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(29 Jul 2015 22:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Per Bothner
(29 Jul 2015 23:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2015 03:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(01 Aug 2015 03:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(31 Jul 2015 20:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Per Bothner
(31 Jul 2015 22:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2015 23:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2015 23:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals Bradley Lucier (01 Aug 2015 02:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(29 Jul 2015 21:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(29 Jul 2015 22:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2015 04:20 UTC)
|
On 07/31/2015 07:37 PM, John Cowan wrote: > Bradley Lucier scripsit: > >> I don't think we need that convention here, scheme has perfectly good >> non-array objects. > > But so do Common Lisp, NumPy, Julia, and most significantly Racket > <http://docs.racket-lang.org/math/array_quick.html>. Thank you for the pointer, I'm going to study Racket's arrays for a while before commenting again. Brad
