|
empty intervals
Per Bothner
(29 Jul 2015 16:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(29 Jul 2015 17:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(29 Jul 2015 17:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(29 Jul 2015 20:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Per Bothner
(29 Jul 2015 20:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(29 Jul 2015 22:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Per Bothner
(29 Jul 2015 23:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2015 03:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals Bradley Lucier (01 Aug 2015 03:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(31 Jul 2015 20:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Per Bothner
(31 Jul 2015 22:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2015 23:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2015 23:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(01 Aug 2015 02:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(29 Jul 2015 21:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
Bradley Lucier
(29 Jul 2015 22:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: empty intervals
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2015 04:20 UTC)
|
Re: empty intervals Bradley Lucier 01 Aug 2015 03:57 UTC
On 07/31/2015 11:52 PM, John Cowan wrote: > Per Bothner scripsit: > >> Note we can simplify much of the specification and API by restricting >> lower bounds to zeros. > > Indeed. For the rare use cases when you need non-zero lower bounds, > something like SRFI 25's share-array is quite general. > For me, non-zero lower bounds are the norm in many applications. Brad