Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array? John Cowan 05 Aug 2015 17:46 UTC

Jamison Hope scripsit:

> I would suggest "simple-array"; what you're describing is similar to how
> that term is used in Common Lisp (although it's not an exact match).

I thought about that, but there are issues that I'll take up in another posting.

> Also, I think John already touched on this, but an array being
> fixed/eager/simple/whatever should have no bearing on its mutability.


John Cowan
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was looking through a
spyglass with my one good eye, with a parrot standing on my shoulder. --"Y"