Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array? John Cowan 05 Aug 2015 17:46 UTC
Jamison Hope scripsit: > I would suggest "simple-array"; what you're describing is similar to how > that term is used in Common Lisp (although it's not an exact match). I thought about that, but there are issues that I'll take up in another posting. > Also, I think John already touched on this, but an array being > fixed/eager/simple/whatever should have no bearing on its mutability. Indeed. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan email@example.com If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was looking through a spyglass with my one good eye, with a parrot standing on my shoulder. --"Y"