|
Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array?
Bradley Lucier
(05 Aug 2015 00:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array?
Jamison Hope
(05 Aug 2015 14:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array?
John Cowan
(05 Aug 2015 17:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array? Bradley Lucier (17 Aug 2015 19:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array?
John Cowan
(25 Aug 2015 12:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array?
Jamison Hope
(25 Aug 2015 15:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array?
Bradley Lucier
(31 Aug 2015 00:26 UTC)
|
|
Laziness (was: Terminology)
John Cowan
(05 Aug 2015 16:55 UTC)
|
Re: Terminology: fixed-array => eager-array? Bradley Lucier 17 Aug 2015 19:25 UTC
On 08/05/2015 01:46 PM, John Cowan wrote: > Jamison Hope scripsit: > >> I would suggest "simple-array"; what you're describing is similar to how >> that term is used in Common Lisp (although it's not an exact match). > > I thought about that, but there are issues that I'll take up in another posting. I'm leaning towards "simple-array", so what do you think are the issues? Brad