Re: relationship to SRFI-25 John Cowan 30 Jul 2015 19:41 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

> Why can't SRFI-122 be a compatible superset of SRFI-25?

The obvious point is that there is nothing in SRFI-25 corresponding
to a storage class.  You could use clever argument defaulting.

> Why would anyone want to write:
>   ((array-getter a) i j)
> instead of:
>   (array-ref a i j)

Got me.  However, there will have to be an array utility library on top of
this SRFI if it is aimed at scientific programmers.

John Cowan
In my last lifetime, I believed in reincarnation;
in this lifetime, I don't.  --Thiagi
To unsubscribe from this list please goto