Re: relationship to SRFI-25

Show/hide message thread

relationship to SRFI-25 Per Bothner (30 Jul 2015 05:30 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 John Cowan (30 Jul 2015 20:20 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (31 Jul 2015 21:00 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (26 Sep 2015 18:33 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Per Bothner (27 Sep 2015 05:34 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (28 Sep 2015 21:04 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Per Bothner (28 Sep 2015 21:29 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (28 Sep 2015 21:54 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Jamison Hope (28 Sep 2015 22:22 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (28 Sep 2015 22:38 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Jamison Hope (28 Sep 2015 23:20 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (29 Sep 2015 06:03 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Jamison Hope (29 Sep 2015 16:12 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Bradley Lucier (30 Sep 2015 03:42 UTC)

Re: relationship to SRFI-25 John Cowan 30 Jul 2015 19:41 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

> Why can't SRFI-122 be a compatible superset of SRFI-25?

The obvious point is that there is nothing in SRFI-25 corresponding
to a storage class.  You could use clever argument defaulting.

> Why would anyone want to write:
>   ((array-getter a) i j)
> instead of:
>   (array-ref a i j)

Got me.  However, there will have to be an array utility library on top of
this SRFI if it is aimed at scientific programmers.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
In my last lifetime, I believed in reincarnation;
in this lifetime, I don't.  --Thiagi
To unsubscribe from this list please goto http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=pdvfNHNthaIEnEE0PiaBy19L7i2YkVFQ