fixed-array => special-array or specialized-array ???
Bradley Lucier
(31 Aug 2015 20:48 UTC)
|
Re: fixed-array => special-array or specialized-array ???
John Cowan
(31 Aug 2015 21:49 UTC)
|
Re: fixed-array => special-array or specialized-array ??? Bradley Lucier (31 Aug 2015 21:51 UTC)
|
Re: fixed-array => special-array or specialized-array ???
Jamison Hope
(01 Sep 2015 19:11 UTC)
|
Re: fixed-array => special-array or specialized-array ???
Bradley Lucier
(02 Sep 2015 17:27 UTC)
|
Re: fixed-array => special-array or specialized-array ???
John Cowan
(06 Sep 2015 18:42 UTC)
|
Re: fixed-array => special-array or specialized-array ???
Bradley Lucier
(09 Sep 2015 18:27 UTC)
|
Re: fixed-array => special-array or specialized-array ??? Bradley Lucier 31 Aug 2015 21:50 UTC
On 08/31/2015 05:49 PM, John Cowan wrote: > Bradley Lucier scripsit: > >> I've sort of given up trying to get a descriptive word that >> describes what makes fixed-arrays special or specialized, so I'd >> just like to change it to special-array (as it's shorter than >> specialized-array). > > How about using general-array for what you now call arrays, and use > array for the fixed-arrays, then? Move the generality up one level, > so to speak. > Well, I prefer array-map, array-curry, etc., to general-array-map, general-array-curry, ... Brad