|
relationship to SRFI-25
Per Bothner
(30 Jul 2015 05:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
John Cowan
(30 Jul 2015 20:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Bradley Lucier
(31 Jul 2015 21:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Bradley Lucier
(26 Sep 2015 18:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25 Per Bothner (27 Sep 2015 05:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Bradley Lucier
(28 Sep 2015 21:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Per Bothner
(28 Sep 2015 21:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Bradley Lucier
(28 Sep 2015 21:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Jamison Hope
(28 Sep 2015 22:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Bradley Lucier
(28 Sep 2015 22:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Jamison Hope
(28 Sep 2015 23:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Bradley Lucier
(29 Sep 2015 06:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Jamison Hope
(29 Sep 2015 16:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: relationship to SRFI-25
Bradley Lucier
(30 Sep 2015 03:42 UTC)
|
On 09/26/2015 11:33 AM, Bradley Lucier wrote: > Per: > > You questioned the relationship between SRFI-25 and SRFI-122, implying that it was obscure. > > Should there be more commentary in SRFI-122 about the differences and similarities? I think so. From a quick glance, I don't see any direct conflicts. It should be possible to implement SRFI-25 arrays using specialized-array. Or have both be implemented using lower-level primitives, which I would probably do for Kawa. I think this has been mentioned before: the name specialized-array-share! should not end in a '!'. -- --Per Bothner xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
