Re: some srfi122 comments
Per Bothner 28 Sep 2015 19:50 UTC
On 09/26/2015 10:22 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
> *The interval API is big. This could be avoided if intervals
> were vectors or arrays (as SRFI-25 shapes). It is nice to
> abstract away the representation, but not at the cost of
> 19 new procedures!
More fundamentally: It's nice to have the flexibility of non-zero
lower index bounds, but it does complicate the API a lot, and it
adds some extra run-time overhead - without adding any extra "power".
If we drop non-zero lower bounds, then "an internal" is just
a vector of integers, and no "interval API" is needed.
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/