Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
Arthur A. Gleckler
(29 Nov 2016 23:51 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
John Cowan
(01 Dec 2016 02:14 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
Sudarshan S Chawathe
(03 Dec 2016 22:35 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays Bradley Lucier (05 Dec 2016 18:35 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
Bradley Lucier
(05 Dec 2016 18:53 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
Bradley Lucier
(09 Dec 2016 22:00 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays Bradley Lucier 05 Dec 2016 18:35 UTC
On 11/30/2016 09:13 PM, John Cowan wrote: > 1) I think that interval-divide is a better name than interval-curry. > It reflects the analogous use of "divide" in Codd's' relational algebra. About naming what is now called interval-curry: 1. One could use a term from colloquial English---divide or split, say. (I don't like "chop" because in my use of colloquial English one often discards the part that's been chopped off.) 2. One could use a suggestive term from a related field. I chose "interval-curry" from currying in programming languages. John suggests "interval-divide" from the division operator in Codd's relational algebra. After thinking about it, I'm going to use "interval-projections". The result of the operation is the same as the projection operator in relational algebra; it's also projections in set theory. It returns two projections of the interval, which are chosen by the second parameter. Brad